Playlist mode, adding songs work in new format

This commit is contained in:
Kristy Fournier 2025-03-05 15:18:05 -05:00
parent 9a3008b29e
commit cf8796a3a1
2 changed files with 47 additions and 56 deletions

View file

@ -4,12 +4,16 @@ from flask_cors import CORS
import json,vlc,threading,time,random, argparse
# Argparse Stuff
parser=argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Options for the Webby Bits")
parser.add_argument('-d','--directory',help="Directory of the song files (make sure this matches the directory used for the databaseGenerator)", default="./sound/")
# this is no longer needed assuming my file works correctly with the generator
# parser.add_argument('-d','--directory',help="Directory of the song files (make sure this matches the directory used for the databaseGenerator)", default="./sound/")
parser.add_argument('-p','--port',help="Port to host on, not the same as the web (client) port",default='19054')
portTheUserPicked=parser.parse_args().port
soundLocation = parser.parse_args().directory
# To set the directory permenantly just uncomment the next line
# soundLocation = "/example/directory/here/"
# open the json file as a dictionary
with open('./songDatabase.json', 'r') as handle:
songDatabaseList = json.load(handle)
soundLocation = songDatabaseList["songDirectory"]
if soundLocation[-1] == "/" or soundLocation[-1] == "\\":
pass
elif "/" in soundLocation:
@ -33,9 +37,6 @@ player.audio_set_volume(100)
app = Flask(__name__)
# because you are posting from another domain to this one, you need CORS
CORS(app)
# open the json file as a dictionary
with open('./songDatabase.json', 'r') as handle:
songDatabaseList = json.load(handle)
def queueSong(song):
with playlistLock:
@ -116,16 +117,16 @@ def searchSongDB():
# the way i put the data in a list was really dumb looking back, i could and should have used a list of dictioaries like i was before
# i might try to change it but this layout is embedded deep in the client
tempData = {}
for i in songDatabaseList:
if ((i["title"].lower().find(recieveData['search'].lower())) > -1) or (recieveData['search'] == ""):
# In future i would change this to index based on the filename so that it is definately unique
tempData[i["title"]] = [i["artist"],i["art"],i["file"]]
for i in songDatabaseList["songData"]:
if ((songDatabaseList["songData"][i]["title"].lower().find(recieveData['search'].lower())) > -1) or (recieveData['search'] == ""):
tempData[i] = songDatabaseList["songData"][i]
try:
if (i["artist"].lower().find(recieveData['search'].lower()) > -1):
tempData[i["title"]] = [i["artist"],i["art"],i["file"]]
if (songDatabaseList["songData"][i]["artist"].lower().find(recieveData['search'].lower()) > -1):
tempData[i] = songDatabaseList["songData"][i]
except:
pass
print(tempData)
return tempData
@app.route("/songadd", methods=["POST"])
@ -137,26 +138,16 @@ def songadd():
def getPlaylist():
global songNext
tempPlaylist = []
# what went through my head to make past-me think this is a good idea???
# i mean actually looping through once still shouldn't ever take that long
# but like a binary search must exist in python and be faster
# wait no binary search only helps if they're sorted
# i mean i guess i could sort them and make searching faster
for k in songDatabaseList:
if k["file"] == songNext:
temp = k.copy()
temp["playing"] = True
temp["time"] = player.get_time()/1000
tempPlaylist.append(temp)
if songNext != None:
# Adds the currently playing song
k = songDatabaseList["songData"][songNext]
temp = k.copy()
temp["playing"] = True
temp["time"] = player.get_time()/1000
tempPlaylist.append({songNext:temp})
for i in playlist:
# oh my goodness i did it again
# i seriously need to rewrite the databaseGenerator and this code
# wait isn't this literally useless code???
# oh no the playlist only contains names
# i should really have used an object for this.
for j in songDatabaseList:
if j["file"] == i:
tempPlaylist.append(j)
tempPlaylist.append({i:songDatabaseList["songData"][i]})
print(tempPlaylist)
return tempPlaylist
if __name__ == "__main__":